Thanks Andrea. I'm attempting to make these styles a bit more concise (as you suggested). So, here are more details:
The shapefile: http://svn.opengeo.org/suite/trunk/data_dir/data/medford/medford_streets.shp The style: http://svn.opengeo.org/suite/trunk/data_dir/styles/medford_streets.sld Best, Alyssa. On 9/21/10 4:42 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On 21/09/2010 21:08, Ian Turton wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:49 PM, alyssa wright<awri...@opengeo.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering if there's something like the vendor option >>> <VendorOption name="forceLeftToRight">false</VendorOption> for vertical >>> line geometries. Or if there's some other suggested way to have labels >>> all facing the same way in this sort of situation: >>> >>> http://skitch.com/alyssawright/dadsh/label-orientation >> >> Might it work better if you used a LinePlacement instead of the >> PointPlacement? >> >> <sld:LinePlacement> >> <sld:PerpendicularOffset> >> <ogc:Literal>10</ogc:Literal> >> </sld:PerpendicularOffset> >> </sld:LinePlacement> > > Actually in the latest versions line placement is inferred by the > fact you're enabling followLine. > > The issue I see is that the labelling code assumes both vertical > orientations are readable and good. Readable they are, good they're not > as it makes reading the map with multiple orientations harder. > > Alyssa, do you have a sample data set + styling I can use to reproduce > the issue? Should be just a matter of changing a<= into a< in the > code, but I want to make sure > > Cheers > Andrea > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
