:-) I think in a few weeks we will implement your last option (using both) because we will add support for lat/lon spots. Btw, once you are able to compile and run some examples, geotools is really a very funny library. I really hope we will start soon the new project in order to use it intensively.
cheers! On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Michael Bedward <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi jv, > > Well, if you are going to be displaying or printing the maps at fine > scale then it makes sense to use polygons - but in that case I guess > you would really like to use polygons that correspond to the > boundaries of your areas, however they are defined. Then you could > have the outline and fill colours of the polygons based on the status > (Fiability) of each area. > > On the other hand, if you're most interested in broad scale stuff such > that your 10 sq km areas are tiny on the map, then you might as well > use point features and marks for your styling. It's less work. > > Of course, you can do both... > > Michael > -- ======================================================= Javier Moreno www.imaginafoto.com ======================================================= ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
