On 15/08/10 19:05, Luca Morandini wrote: > On 14/08/10 23:17, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Does Terracotta require the entire set of objects managed by the >> process to be shareable? > > No, you can specify a subset of objects to share. I specified the > org.geoserver.config.impl.GeoServerImpl.catalog one, which may be too wide: I > may > try a narrower one, which means I shall dig deeper in the GS/GT code... groan > !
I analysed the dependencies amongst classes, and the result were not truly encouraging: for instance, there are about 867 classes depending on WeakHashSet (a lot of them within the catalog: LayerInfo, DataStoreInfo, etc, etc). AFAIU, GeoTools manages its own cache, which is at odds with the whole Terracotta concept. Regards, -------------------- Luca Morandini www.lucamorandini.it -------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list Geotools-gt2-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users