Thanks for coding help but, the problem is worse (for me...), PID w172vg029mkl852 Business Matters - Former US Vice President Al Gore on Climate Change (w172vg029mkl852)
So not even 8 characters. Other World Service Series (?) have similar PIDs now, e.g. Weekend, World Update. And I thought I was the only one who listened to WS! M. > Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 10:05 AM > From: "Ralph Corderoy" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: New radio PIDs > > Hi Vangelis, > > > ...to begin with either "b0" or "p0". > > > > New radio PIDs like "w3csv1y9" or "w3csvnyc", beginning with "w3", > ... > > [bp]0[a-z0-9]{6} > > with > > [bpw][a-z0-9]{7} > > Other approaches, getting gradually more specific. > > ^[bpw][03][a-z0-9]{6}$ > But this allows b3. > > ^(b0|p0|w3)[a-z0-9]{6}$ > This is precise, but it's common to factor out alternations since > each is tried in turn, so... > > ^([bp]0|w3)[a-z0-9]{6}$ > This is as precise. > > The remaining problem is the `()' "capture" what matches for retrieval > by the program afterwards as $1, $2, ... By introducing another set of > `()' we'd have affected the position of any that come afterwards in the > same regexp. (None in this case.) It's also inefficient to capture > when it's unnecessary. `()' can be marked as non-capturing with `?:'. > > ^(?:[bp]0|w3)[a-z0-9]{6}$ > > These regexps aren't specific to Perl, BTW, but are useful with egrep, > awk, Python, etc. > > -- > Cheers, Ralph. > https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy > > _______________________________________________ > get_iplayer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer > _______________________________________________ get_iplayer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
