No, it's all done on a local (ZFS) file system (I don't even have any NFS volumes mounted), although I *am* using a separate build tree.
Geoff On 06/28/2013 10:30 AM, Simon Marlow wrote: > Geoff - is it possible that this problem might be caused by time skew > between NFS servers? Are any parts of the build, or files accessed by > it, on NFS? > > Cheers, > Simon > > On 24/06/13 23:44, Geoffrey Mainland wrote: >> On 06/24/2013 09:21 PM, Jan Stolarek wrote: >>>> My only claim was that I have a set of steps that can reliably >>>> reproduce >>>> an error on my system, not that these steps will reliably reproduce it >>>> on an arbitrary system, e.g., yours. Still, being able to reliably >>>> reproduce an error, even if only on one system, is *very* useful. >>> just misunderstood your use of the word "reliable". Certainly having >> this level of >>> reproducibility is very helpful in debugging, even if it's only on one >> machine. >>> >>>> So, to be clear, you see recache errors sporadically and for different >>>> sets of tests across different runs, and you are running validate with >>>> no extra arguments, single-threaded, on a Linux x86_64 system with an >>>> ext4 file system? >>> Yes, except I would say "very often" instead of "sporadically". I'm >> not sure about >>> single-threaded. I run validate without any parameters - doesn't it >> use more then one thread in >>> this case? >> >> It looks like running validate without any parameters will use 2 >> threads. >> >> I've pushed a fix (I hope) for this issue. Could you check and see if >> it's fixed for you now? >> >> Geoff >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ghc-devs mailing list >> ghc-devs@haskell.org >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >> > _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs