Sven Neumann wrote:
> "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do I correctly surmise that regex could be removed
> > without being missed?
>
> Actually I don't understand at all why you are dealing with this
> code. It seems unrelated to 16-bit or floating point support. If you
> ask me, stop fiddling with this stone-old code base and try to help
> building a gimp core that fits the needs of film-editing.
Ever the diplomat, Sven. I think the point is probably to do a
trawl through legacy code and see how much of it can be flushed,
if any. At least that's how I took it. Now that Robin knows that
the regex code is useful, at least to some people, he's not
planning on touching it.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary,
Marseille, France
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
