Boot Camp . . . good idea. Docs . . . good idea. Let the newbie's like me (coming out of boot camp) write some of the Docs.
Presently I have everything compiled and running under Ubuntu, and I am just reviewing the code to get some sort of context. It is huge. Incredible, actually. Who wrote all of this? Wow. A few comments: * It seems to work best to put the entire project (all source, and all build product) under a project folder in the Home directory. * If possible, that should include a *copy *of any external dependencies . . . with environment variables (etc) adjusted accordingly * The project ought to be able to exist in a "*bubble*" . . . so as to avoid confusion . . . regarding copies of dependencies that might exist in the OS. * Multiple different project versions ought to be able to exist on the same machine without stepping over each other. Note: I wrote a minimal bash script that duplicates (automates) the steps I took to get to the present state. Maybe we could expand on that idea. * If we do it right, compiling for Linux vs. Windows vs. OSx ought require no more than the flip of a switch. The Blender folks, and others, are moving in that direction. * Shouldn't we standardize on a common development IDE (like Eclipse)? If I am missing something in that area . . . let me know. Thanks, Steve Greenwalt (a.k.a. "Acumen") 2011/1/27 Łukasz Czerwiński <[email protected]> > Maybe just a good documentation for GIMP source is needed? Once I tried to > patch TinyScheme interpreter to make it work faster. In files I was working > on was almost no comments. > > Łukasz Czerwiński > > > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer > >
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
