Sorry I missed this thread earlier. I'll drop this if it's not something that's wanted.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:51:34PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sitaram Chamarty <sitar...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Uggh, no. Client-git should only talk to server-git. It shouldn't be > > talking first to some *other* program (in this case gitolite), and > > then to to server-git. That doesn't sound sane to me. This is exactly the way gitolite works. It's placed between git-server and git-client. Does some checks and approves a connection if some criterias isn't met. See the example when trying to clone an non-existing repo from gitolite. You won't get an git error but a gitolite error. I can understand why my idea is beeing rejected but I can't see why the gitolite way should be considered sane. It seems more like an hack to me (according to git design principles). So from a git point of view, why is it sane for passing through STDERR but not STDIN and STDOUT? (I realize that this is a closed matter but would appriciate an explanation solely for my own educational purpose). -- Med vänliga hälsningar Fredrik Gustafsson tel: 0733-608274 e-post: iv...@iveqy.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
