On 02/02/2017 02:40 AM, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > >> ls-remote needs to complete remote names and its own options. > > And refnames, too.
Yes, right. However, do you think it is reasonable to complete remote refnames? I don't think so, because it would mean we would have to run ls-remote during completion -- and waiting for ls-remote could be quite lengthy. >> In >> addition to the existing remote name completions, do also complete >> the options --heads, --tags, --refs, and --get-url. > > Why only these four options and not the other four? > > There are eight options in total here, so there is really no chance > for cluttered terminals, and all eight are mentioned in the synopsis. My line of thought is the following: --quiet: does not print anything and is therefore only useful for scripting. Thus, there is no need to have it on the command line completion. --exit-code: has no visible effect and is only useful for scripting. --upload-pack: is really exotic. Nobody will ever use it without digging deep in the manuals. Therefore, I think it's unnecessary to have the option completable. --symref: Should probably be added, thanks. However, if you don't find my reasoning for omitting the three options above conclusive, I have no problem including them.
