Hi Duy, On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Duy, > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin > > <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote: > > > > > >> You meant this one [1]? There is nothing substantial since then. > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> https://public-inbox.org/git/%3c20160601104519.16563-1-pclo...@gmail.com%3E/ > > > > I could rebase and clean it up a bit if you need it, but I don't > > think it'll end up in 'pu' or anywhere near since Junio wanted a > > cleaner approach [1]. That means (as far as I can see) a lot more work > > around refs store and backend area before it's ready to handle "get > > refs from this worktree store" (or "get refs from every reachable > > stores"). > > > > [1] > > https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqshwwzyee....@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/ Given that https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqy46ntrhk....@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/ seems to have expected something to happen within a reasonable time frame, and that 8 months is substantially longer than a reasonable time frame, I am not sure that that position can still be defended. Also, the more important reply was Peff's reply that suggested that the proposed fix was incomplete, as it misses --unpack-unreachable: https://public-inbox.org/git/20160601160143.ga9...@sigill.intra.peff.net/ Ciao, Johannes
