Am 25.02.2017 um 21:15 schrieb Jeff King:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:27:40PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:
Both standard_header_field() and excluded_header_field() check if
there's a space after the buffer that's handed to them. We already
check in the caller if that space is present. Don't bother calling
the functions if it's missing, as they are guaranteed to return 0 in
that case, and remove the now redundant checks from them.
Makes sense, and I couldn't spot any errors in your logic or in the
code.
Thanks for checking!
static inline int standard_header_field(const char *field, size_t len)
{
- return ((len == 4 && !memcmp(field, "tree ", 5)) ||
- (len == 6 && !memcmp(field, "parent ", 7)) ||
- (len == 6 && !memcmp(field, "author ", 7)) ||
- (len == 9 && !memcmp(field, "committer ", 10)) ||
- (len == 8 && !memcmp(field, "encoding ", 9)));
+ return ((len == 4 && !memcmp(field, "tree", 4)) ||
+ (len == 6 && !memcmp(field, "parent", 6)) ||
+ (len == 6 && !memcmp(field, "author", 6)) ||
+ (len == 9 && !memcmp(field, "committer", 9)) ||
+ (len == 8 && !memcmp(field, "encoding", 8)));
Unrelated, but this could probably be spelled with a macro and strlen()
to avoid the magic numbers. It would probably be measurably slower for a
compiler which doesn't pre-compute strlen() on a string literal, though.
sizeof(string_constant) - 1 might be a better choice here than strlen().
René
