On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:14:19AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > This change is about dropping the need for ".hash", and I think a > faithful, boring and mechanical conversion that tries to preserve > the intent of the original author would be more appropriate. It is > entirely possible that some places where the original said E2[E3] > were easier to understand if it were *(E2 + E3), thus we may want to > further rewrite such a place to (E2 + E3) instead of &E2[E3] after > the mechanical conversion.
You've convinced me that &E2[E3] is a better choice in this situation, so I'll reroll and fix the other issues mentioned. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
