I had meant to change the name to match what is in find_single_final.
While the intent was for it to change while in builtin/blame.c,
apparently I missed that in the shuffle.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Jeff Smith <whydo...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Smith <whydo...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> blame.c | 279
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> blame.h | 10 +-
>> builtin/blame.c | 276
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> 3 files changed, 281 insertions(+), 284 deletions(-)
>>
>> ...
>> +static struct commit *find_single_initial(struct rev_info *revs,
>> + const char **name_p)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct commit *found = NULL;
>> + const char *name = NULL;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * There must be one and only one negative commit, and it must be
>> + * the boundary.
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < revs->pending.nr; i++) {
>> + struct object *obj = revs->pending.objects[i].item;
>> + if (!(obj->flags & UNINTERESTING))
>> + continue;
>> + obj = deref_tag(obj, NULL, 0);
>> + if (obj->type != OBJ_COMMIT)
>> + die("Non commit %s?", revs->pending.objects[i].name);
>> + if (found)
>> + die("More than one commit to dig up from, %s and %s?",
>> + revs->pending.objects[i].name, name);
>> + found = (struct commit *) obj;
>> + name = revs->pending.objects[i].name;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!name)
>> + found = dwim_reverse_initial(revs, &name);
>> + if (!name)
>> + die("No commit to dig up from?");
>> +
>> + if (name_p)
>> + *name_p = name;
>> + return found;
>> +}
>> +...
>> -static struct commit *find_single_initial(struct rev_info *revs,
>> - const char **name_p)
>> -{
>> - int i;
>> - const char *final_commit_name = NULL;
>> - struct commit *found = NULL;
>> -
>> -...
>> -
>> - if (!final_commit_name)
>> - found = dwim_reverse_initial(revs, &final_commit_name);
>> - if (!final_commit_name)
>> - die("No commit to dig up from?");
>> -
>> - if (name_p)
>> - *name_p = final_commit_name;
>> - return found;
>> -}
>
>
> In a patch whose primary purpose is to move code between files,
> making what used to be public to static and vice versa is an
> integral part of moving code. That is why we want to see a patch
> organized in such a way that comparing the lines that are lost from
> builtin/blame.c and the lines that are added to blame.[ch] is made
> easy.
>
> And from that point of view, it was somewhat irritating to find this
> kind of meaningless change. If you didn't like the name of the
> variable "final-commit-name", that shold have been renamed while the
> code was still in builtin/blame.c
>
> The end result looks OK anyway (I've checked 29/29 as well).
>
> Thanks.
>
>
