Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > And *technically* the two level is old style, so I figured it's ok.
If we call the bit not after the recentness of the style but after what it is about, e.g. "is the section name as a whole (including its possible subsection part) case insensitive?", then yes, a two-level name can be treated exactly the same way as the old style names with a subsection. Perhaps we should do that rename to save us from future confusion. >> > - !strncasecmp(cf->var.buf, store->key, >> > store->baselen); >> > + !cmpfn(cf->var.buf, store->key, store->baselen); >> >> OK. Section names should still be case insensitive (only the case >> sensitivity of subsection names is special), but presumably that's >> already normalized by the caller so we do not have to worry when we >> use strncmp()? Can we add a test to demonstrate that it works >> correctly? > > That was already demonstrated (but not tested) in > https://public-inbox.org/git/20180730230443.74416-4-sbel...@google.com/ Yeah, I also manually tried when I was playing with the old-style names to see how well it works. We would want to make sure this won't get broken in the future, still. Thanks.
