Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > I had two minor comments on the first patch. I'll admit my eyes glazed > over looking at the rest of them, and to make any kind of intelligent > review I'd need to spend an hour understanding how the sed script works. > Which frankly, I'm not sure is worth it.
Didn't I make this prediction when we started the "text inspection" approach that it quickly go downhill resulting in unmaintainable mess rather quickly ;-)? > Given the empirical results > (both on the real code base and the new tests you add) and the low-risk > nature (it's linting our tests, after all, not code users run), I'd be > inclined to say it's not making anything worse, and probably making > things better. We can find out about any further short-comings in the > wild. Amen to that.
