On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> wrote: > On 2014-02-10 11.37, Duy Nguyen wrote: >>> >>> Could we use relative path names internally, relative to $GIT_DIR ? >> >> No because this is when the client tell the server about $GIT_DIR. I >> guess we can use realpath(1) here. > Good. > > I realized that the watcher can watch several repos at the same time. > > However, we could allow relative path names, which will be relative to > $SOCKET_DIR, > and loosen the demand for an absolut path name a little bit. > And $SOCKET_DIR can be the same as $GIT_DIR, when we are watching only one > repo.
It does not help much anyway because file-watcher-lib.c sends get_git_work_tree(), which is absolute/normalized path, to file-watcher. There's no sources of sending $GIT_DIR relative to $SOCKET_DIR (and I don't think we want to make get_git_work_tree() relative before sending, it's more work on both sides we no benefits, except for tracing). -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
