Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > Lower depth than default (50) does not sound "aggressive" to me, at > least from disk space utilization. I agree it should be configurable > though.
Do you mean you want to keep "--aggressive" to mean "too aggressive in resulting size, to the point that it is not useful to anybody"? Shallow and wide will give us, with a large window, the most aggressively efficient packfiles that are useful, and we would rather want to fix it to be usable, I would think. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
