Christian Couder <christian.cou...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:20 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> "Git Annotate"? >> >> "Git Praise" as opposed to blame? >> "Git Who" as a pun on the subcommand structure which doesn't always >> follows grammar? > > Yeah these suggestions above are nice, thanks for them, but "Git Rev News" > also look a bit like "git rev-list" and "git rev-parse" which are plumbing Git > commands, so it gives a somewhat "hardcore" look to the news letter which > I like.
Call that "Git Rev List" then to be more direct? I myself liked the "Review" (spelled in full word) as its non-nerdy sound, as a suitable name for a publication that bridges between hard-core developers and slightly-more-serious-than-casual observers, but its not my call (and as I often say, I am not good at naming things) ;-). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
