On 5/21/2015 7:51 AM, Heiko Voigt wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:29:55PM -0500, Robert Dailey wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Heiko Voigt <hvo...@hvoigt.net> wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:06:32AM -0500, Robert Dailey wrote:
Unfortunately I find it unintuitive and counter productive to perform
inline patches or do anything on a mailing list. Especially on
Windows, it's a pain to setup git to effectively do this. Also I read
mailing lists through Gmail which does not offer a proper monospace
font view or syntax coloring to effectively review patches and
comments pertaining to them.
Are you sure you are not overestimating the effort it takes to send
patches inline? Once you've got your user agent correctly setup its just
a matter of copy and paste instead of attaching the patch. On Windows I
would probably use Thunderbird which has a section in the format-patch
documentation how to configure it. Compared to the effort you probably
spent on writing your patch isn't this bit of extra effort neglectable?
And your patch is almost done. It just needs some tests and maybe a few
rounds on the mailinglist after that.
Since I am not willing to properly follow your process, I will
withdraw my patch. However it is here if someone else wishes to take
it over. Really wish you guys used github's amazing features but I
understand that Linus has already made his decision in that matter.
It not just Linus decision it is also a matter of many people are used
to this workflow. AFAIR there have been many discussions and tries about
using other tools. Email has many advantages which a webinterface does
not provide. It is simply less effort that one person adjusts to this
workflow instead of changing many peoples working workflow.
I'm sorry I couldn't be more agreeable on the matter. Thanks for the
time you spent reviewing my patch.
If you are really this fixed in your workflow that would be too bad.
How do you send your patches inline? Do you use git send-email? I have
tried that and it is horrible to setup. Do you just copy/paste the
patch inline in your compose window?
For bigger patch series I did use send-email but currently I am back to
just using the compose window from whatever email client I am using. On
Windows that would be Thunderbird. But when possible I am not using
Windows.
It would be much simpler to fork Git, create a branch, make my change,
and initiate a pull request. I can get email notifications on comments
to my PR diff and address them with subsequent pushes to my branch
(which would also automatically update the code review). Turn around
times for collaborating on a change are much quicker via Github pull
requests.
I think that depends more on the collaborators than on the tool. When
you get quick replies the turnaround times with both workflows are
quick.
It would be nice if there was a perfect solution for every project that
everyone could use but unfortunately there is not so we sometimes have
to adjust. But I think its more matter of what you are used to. If you
did not have a github account but email software setup you could
complain about the fact that you need to register a github account, fork
git, setup that fork in your local repository, ... instead of just copy
and paste your change into the compose window and then send it to a
mailinglist.
I am willing to review the typical workflow for contributing via git
on mailing lists but I haven't seen any informative reading material
on this. I just find using command line to email patches and dealing
with other issues not worth the trouble. Lack of syntax highlighting,
lack of monospace font, the fact that I'm basically forced to install
mail client software just to contribute a single git patch.
As already mentioned by Stefan there is Documentation/SubmittingPatches
in the Git repository that describes everything and also has a section
on how to do that with Thunderbird.
I tend to not do much on the commandline on Windows since it basically
sucks there. For sending patches you just need
git format-patch HEAD^
and thats it.
Cheers Heiko
So I am working on trying to setup my environment (VM through Virtual
Box) to do some testing on this. You all have encouraged me to try the
mailing list review model. So I won't give up yet.
In the meantime I'd like to ask, do we even need to add an option for
this? What if we just make `diff.submodule log` not use --first-parent?
This seems like a backward compatible change in of itself. And it's
simpler to implement. I can't think of a good justification to add more
settings to an already hugely complex configuration scheme for such a
minor difference in behavior.
Thoughts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
