Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> writes: > When you look at the history for a file via "git log" we don't show > --full-history by default, but the Gitweb UI does so, which can be very > confusing for all the reasons discussed in "History Simplification" in > git-log(1) and in > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89400/focus=90659 > > We've been doing history via --full-history since pretty much forever, > but I think this is much more usable, and on a typical project with lots > of branches being merged it makes for a much less confusing view. We do > this for git log by default, why wouldn't Gitweb follow suit?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89400/focus=90758 seems to agree with you in principle that this would be what gitweb should do if it were written today. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
