Michael J Gruber <g...@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:

> Before someone loses their HEAD I should put this series out (again).
>
> 1/6 is a tiny documentation fix.
>
> 2/6 demonstrates that "git prune" in the main worktree loses HEADs in other
> worktrees, and vice versa.

You do need to teach the reachability code to consider points that
are outside refs/ (HEAD and index, at least; I also recall there
were talks about per-worktree hierarchies in refs/?) as anchoring
objects to the non-prunable part of the history.

The prune/fsck reachability code already knows to consider objects
that are reachable only from the index as reachable, and I do not
think "rev-list --all" is used to enumerate them for safekeeping
(even when the worktree feature is not used).  The reachability code
that enumerates objects in the index and cache-tree needs to learn
to peek into sibling worktrees' private objects, I would think, and
I do not think the addition is a good match for rev-list.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to