> Now, since there's nothing that prevents the directory hierarchies > starting at these roots from overlapping, we have a potential for > ambiguity when we want to map module names to filenames.
This suggests that we might want to modify the search algorithm to find all matches and report and error if two or more candidate files are found. If this is a big performance hit, we could make it a :set option. > Still, the current status is unsatisfactory. Of the two ways > forward pointed at above, dropping the implicit roots and putting > the burden on the programmer to define consistent search paths is by > far the easiest one to implement. However, one should bear in mind > that this will disturb many people, particularly those who don't use > hierarchical modules. Perhaps this disruption could be reduced by making the use of implicit roots a flag you can turn on or off and being careful to avoid overlapping names in the libraries we distribute with Hugs. Naive users would then get to use all the libraries but, since naive users don't use hierarchial namespaces (by my definition :-) they should not run into these problems. Sophisticated users would turn off the use of implicit roots and turn on ambiguous filename checks and would perhaps convert their code to use hierarchial namespaces. -- Alastair Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cs.utah.edu/~reid/ _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users