Simon Marlow wrote:
Right - Ptr isn't the right thing here, because GC will move objects
around. That's why we have StablePtr and StableName.
may it be that makeStableName is expensive? (or it is my additional Map?)
My old version is faster, because the version with makeStableName does
very much GC.
Christian
1. with makeStableName (and a Map):
2,447,401,824 bytes allocated in the heap
703,294,688 bytes copied during GC
50,780,688 bytes maximum residency (24 sample(s))
9328 collections in generation 0 (129.88s)
24 collections in generation 1 ( 4.10s)
99 Mb total memory in use
INIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
MUT time 27.28s ( 28.91s elapsed)
GC time 133.98s (140.08s elapsed)
EXIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
Total time 161.26s (168.99s elapsed)
%GC time 83.1% (82.9% elapsed)
Alloc rate 89,714,143 bytes per MUT second
Productivity 16.9% of total user, 16.1% of total elapsed
2. without makeStableName:
7,560,158,340 bytes allocated in the heap
578,736,496 bytes copied during GC
44,307,024 bytes maximum residency (25 sample(s))
28832 collections in generation 0 ( 6.83s)
25 collections in generation 1 ( 3.20s)
102 Mb total memory in use
INIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
MUT time 139.71s (146.74s elapsed)
GC time 10.03s ( 10.94s elapsed)
EXIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
Total time 149.74s (157.68s elapsed)
%GC time 6.7% (6.9% elapsed)
Alloc rate 54,113,222 bytes per MUT second
Productivity 93.3% of total user, 88.6% of total elapsed
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
