* Edward Kmett <ekm...@gmail.com> [2014-04-25 11:22:46-0400] > +1 from me. I have a lot of projects that suffer with 4 levels of vacuous > subdirectories just for this. > > In theory cabal could support this on older GHC versions by copying all of the > files to a working dir in dist with the expected layout on older GHCs. > > That would enable this to get much greater penetration more quickly.
I'd really not want that people start putting ghc-options: -isrc=... into their cabal files. That'd make them irrecoverably ghc-specific, as no other tool will know how to process the files unless it reads ghc-options. I'm +1 on adding support for this to cabal. Then the mechanism cabal uses to achieve this is just that — an implementation detail. And this new -i syntax can become one of such mechanisms. But cabal support should really come first, so that people aren't tempted by ghc-specific solutions. Roman
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
