On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowd...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul Cuzner" <pcuz...@redhat.com> > > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com> > > Cc: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel" < > gluster-devel@gluster.org> > > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 10:51:17 AM > > Subject: Re: What's the correct way to enable direct-IO? > > > > This is great info - with a lot of options to take in :) > > > > To summarise, to enable direct-io and bypass the kernel filesystem cache > > for a volume > > 1. Mount the brick with direct-io-mode=enable option > > 2. run vol set <vol> performance.strict-o-direct on > > Would individual files be opened with O_DIRECT? If yes, this is > sufficient. But if we want to do that for all files, the only way to do > this is to disable write-behind. > file opens will not be with o_direct BUT if I understand your earlier comments correctly the update to add o-direct to the storage/posix will force o-direct on open/create calls - which would mean vol set <bla> performance.write-behind off would not be required. > > > 3. update the vol files with 'o-direct' option in storage/posix (at least > > for now) > > 4. Quick read should be made aware of O_DIRECT (it doesn't as of now). > Again this is on the read-path. If you don't want O_DIRECT semantics for > read path (is there one?), this is fine. > > performance.quick-read is off for the virt use case. I'll try and test this out tomorrow. Thanks! > > > > Is that right? > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa < > rgowd...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com> > > > > To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, "Raghavendra > Gowdappa" > > > <rgowd...@redhat.com> > > > > Cc: "Paul Cuzner" <pcuz...@redhat.com> > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 7:28:30 AM > > > > Subject: What's the correct way to enable direct-IO? > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > git-grep tells me there are multiple options in our code base for > > > enabling > > > > direct-IO on a gluster volume, at several layers in the translator > stack: > > > > i) use the mount option 'direct-io-mode=enable' > > > > > > This option is between kernel and glusterfs. Specifically it asks fuse > > > kernel module to bypass page-cache. Note that when this option is set, > > > direct-io is enabled for _all_ fds irrespective of whether applications > > > have used O_DIRECT in their open/create calls or not. > > > > > > > ii) enable 'network.remote-dio' which is a protocol/client option > using > > > > volume set command > > > > > > This is an option introduced by [1] to _filter_ O_DIRECT flags in > > > open/create calls before sending those requests to server. The option > name > > > is misleading here. However please note that this is the key (alias?) > used > > > by glusterd. The exact option name used by protocol/client is > > > "filter_O_DIRECT" and its fine. Probably we should file a bug on > glusterd > > > to change the name? > > > > > > Coming to your use case, we don't want to filter O_DIRECT from reaching > > > brick. Hence, we need to set this option to _off_ (by default its > > > disabled). > > > > > > I am still not sure what is the relevance of this option against the > bug > > > it was introduced. If we need direct-io, we've to pass it to brick > too, so > > > that backend fs on brick is configured appropriately. > > > > > > [1] http://review.gluster.org/4206 > > > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845213 > > > > > > > iii) enable performance.strict-o-direct which is a > > > performance/write-behind > > > > option using volume-set command > > > > > > Yes, write-behind honours O_DIRECT only if this option is set. So, we > need > > > to enable this for your use-case. Also, note that applications still > need > > > to use O_DIRECT in open/create calls. > > > > > > To summarize, following are the ways to bypass write-behind cache: > > > 1. disable write-behind :). > > > 2. applications use O_SYNC/O_DSYNC in open calls > > > 3. enable performance.strict-o-direct _and_ applications should use > > > O_DIRECT in open/create calls. > > > > > > > iv) use 'o-direct' option in storage/posix, volume-set on which > reports > > > that > > > > the option doesn't exist. > > > > > > The option exists in storage/posix. But, there is no way to set it > through > > > cli (probably you can send a patch to do that if necessary). With this > > > option, O_DIRECT is passed with _every_ open/create call on the brick. > > > > > > > > > > > So then the question is - what is a surefire way to get > direct-io-like > > > > behavior on gluster volume(s)? > > > > > > There is no one global option. You need to configure various > translators > > > in the stack. Probably [2] was asking for such a feature. Also, as you > > > might've noticed above the behavior/interpretation of these options is > not > > > same across all translators (like some are global and some are local > only > > > to an fd etc). > > > > > > Also note that apart from the options you listed above, > > > 1. Quick-read is not aware of O_DIRECT. We need to make it to disable > > > caching if open happens with O_DIRECT. > > > 2. Handling of Quota Marker xattrs is not synchronous (though not > exactly > > > an O_DIRECT requirement) as marking is done after sending reply to > calls > > > like writev. > > > > > > On a related note, found article [3] to be informative. > > > > > > [1] http://review.gluster.org/4206 > > > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845213 > > > [3] https://lwn.net/Articles/457667/ > > > > > > regards, > > > Raghavendra. > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel