On 12/04/2014, at 1:06 PM, James wrote: > On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 07:16 +0100, Justin Clift wrote: >> On 12/04/2014, at 5:37 AM, James wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I hope there are no objections, but I requested a bug tracker for >>> Puppet-Gluster, and they stuck it under the GlusterFS project. I did >>> this because many new features and tweaks were requested, and I was >>> loosing track and figured I'd experiment more with BZ. >>> >>> Now, if you want a feature or find a bug, I'll ask that you open a >>> ticket, and when I patch it, I'll ask for testing and ideally, at least >>> one ACK before merging to master and closing the bug. >>> >>> New bugs here: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=GlusterFS&component=puppet-gluster >>> >>> If you have issues to raise, although an email to me is probably a good >>> first point of contact too. >>> >>> HTH, and let me know if you have any feedback about this process. >> >> Is there value in adding this to Gerrit, so people can use the Gluster review >> process for it as well? :) > Actually, I think no. Puppet-Gluster is still small, (just a hobby, > won't be big and professional like gnu). If it gets out of hand I'll > reconsider the need.
No worries. :) + Justin -- Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel