On 07/03/2013 11:25 AM, Kurian Thayil wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:12:25 -0400 (EDT)
Ben Turner <btur...@redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kurian Thayil" <kur...@gnuhack.com>
To: "Bobby Jacob" <bobby.ja...@alshaya.com>
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:08:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Recommended filesystem for GlusterFS
bricks.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:52:14 +0000
Bobby Jacob <bobby.ja...@alshaya.com> wrote:
Hi,
Which is the recommended filesystem to be used for the bricks in
glusterFS. ?? XFS/EXT3/EXT4 etc .????
Thanks & Regards,
Bobby Jacob
Senior Technical Systems Engineer | eGroup
P SAVE TREES. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.
XFS is recommended for bricks.
Be sure to set the inode size to 512 to allow enough room for
glusterfs's xattrs:
mkfs.xfs -i size=512 <my block device>
-b
Regards,
K.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Hmm.. Something which I didn't do when builing the cluster :(
Is there any other way other than mkfs.xfs paritition to
change this attribute?
currently xfs_bmap gives the floowing
xfs_bmap -a index.html
index.html:
0: [0..7]: 616184..616191
No, but I wouldn't worry about it. The latest results from our
performance engineering team show that the default values are generally
the best choice.
OTOH, you should mount with inode64 mount option.
--
Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
