Rob Savoye wrote: > Markus Gothe wrote: > >> I think we are using the wrong approach here Rob. Do we really want to >> *LINK* against boost when building from source. All the the code is in >> the headers afaik. I think we should look at other projects using boost >> on this issue, which needs further investigation. > > I'm new to using Boost too. I believe to use Boost headers and mutexes > you have to link against the Boost thread library. I could be wrong, but > if it's not needed, why build it ? I'd just as soon not have too much > complex configuration code if it's not needed. >
Looking at pkgsrc, they have splitted the boost-pkg so you can choose just to install the headers (which is actually what I did on IRIX alas compilation fails due to TU-smart pointers)... I'll go further on this; strk suggested earlier today that we statically link the libgnash* libraries into the binaries which I agree on (and working on modifying the makefiles so they conform to this as we still want the plugin to be a DSO-binary). //Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list Gnash-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
