strk wrote:

>> But some people allready started modifying libltdl, so it is not obvious 
>> what to do now.

  To be honest, we *shouldn't* be modifying libltdl at all. I was just
looking a the diffs, and they're pretty minor. One is a win32 hack that
really shouldn't be there, and the other is a minor addition for riscos.
I believe both these patches could be handled better at a higher level,
and we'd be better off using libtoolize -ltdl to avoid problems.

        - rob -


_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
Gnash-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev

Reply via email to