Hello strk, Tuesday, November 6, 2007, 8:52:33 AM, you wrote: s> We can produce all weird cases with Ming, ready to give them a try ? s> Also, the testcase you attached was malformed too, I guess your new s> implementation fails in that case.
I does not fail (used a similar shape for testing), since it defines the left fill style for a line that goes upwards. The implementation checks the other side. However, I agree that it is not optimal. The implementation should work as well reversed but would fail in that case. I still wonder why the line has a fill style at all (it is a subshape, right?). s> I just tested with revision 1.44 of shape_character_def, and the above s> works fine (while it fails with your new implementation). The new implementation works with most files I tested (including some very complex graphics with a few hundred paths), so in the sum it should be better. But ok, it should work in any case. Do we have any document exactly describing shapes so we can avoid false assumptions? Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
