On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone interested in spending time on replacing std::future with
> something working on armv5 too?

Forgive my ignorance:  this is the first time I heard that something
from std::future didn't work on armv5.  Does gnash compile but fail to
run correctly, or does it fail to compile on armv5?

What part of std::future is at fault?  Does this mean we need to fix
gcc or glibc?

Sincerely,
Richard

_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
Gnash-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev

Reply via email to