>> I bet that was when the standard security commands in Ubuntu got replaced >> with the security commands of SE Linux. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security-Enhanced_Linux > >I bet your rationale is right, but from a specifics standpoint, wouldn't >that be AppArmor? I know that SE Linux is supported (as of 8.04) for >Ubuntu, but I believe that AppArmor is the default security mechanism. > >-Ken
You may be right. AppArmor seems to be loaded by default. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AppArmor http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/karmic/beta http://www.novell.com/linux/security/apparmor/selinux_comparison.html _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
