On 11/18/2013 12:39 PM, David Rysdam wrote: > Tyson Sawyer <ty...@j3.org> writes: >> What is the "open source action" that she refers to and can be found >> in the description of the segment? Is the meaning of "open source" >> being changed by some groups? > She might be garbling a little. In the intelligence community, "open > source" means "we didn't have Mata Hari anything, we found it from > websites, books, newspapers", etc. Open sources. > > So she could be trying to say: "We know from open sources that at least > one group is trying to DoS us" meaning something like "There is a group > out there with the stated, public mission to try to DoS us" or "A recent > newspaper investigation found a hacking group that blah blah blah" etc. >
Yeah, that's my take. Though it wouldn't surprise me if there was (D)DoS software that's GPL-licensed. _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
