Stefaan A Eeckels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is also quite clear to anyone reading the American (USA) copyright > statutes that requiring a library, or anything, to run is _not_ a > criterion for a derivative work.
It is not clear to me at all. > I further believe that pretending this is the case opens a can of > worms better left shut. I'd like your opinion on that, BTW. My opinion on both US and EU copyright law is that they have opened a lot of cans. The worms are all over the place already. Martin _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
