On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:13:03 +0100, Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> That might be a fair interpretation except that dynamic linking is >> pretty much rules out even without taking semantics into account. > > As you are undoubtedly aware, many participants in this newsgroup > disagree with this statement. I won't repeat here what has already > been said numerous times; search the archives if in doubt.
Of course. Many people do disagree with the statement, but few disagree that the statement represents the FSF's position. Isaac _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
