Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:59:54 > +0100: > > > Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > >> That is true. However, when you take two short stories, commingle > >> paragraphs from one of them with paragraphs from the other, connecting > >> them up with sentences of your own to give a new short story, you have > >> a derivative work. Doing this may be unusual for stories, but is a > >> perfectly normal way of creating software. > > > Maybe in the GNU Republic. > > Why do you try to be disparaging about GNU?
My hobby. > > > I can't recall ever "commingling" software. > > You poor thing! No wonder you come over so uptight and frustrated on > this newsgroup. ;-) > > Are you a programmer, in any sense of that word? Sort of. > If so, your failure to > commingle existing software might explain why your software is less good > than GNU's. Yeah, right. The GNU is the "best of breed", I know. > > Did you actually look "commingle" up in a dictionary? I know what you mean. It's akin to Moglen's "interpenetration". regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
