David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Oh dear dak... > > > > David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > David Kastrup wrote: > >> > [...] > >> >> The GPL does not demand _anything_ as long as you are not using > >> >> _others'_ property licensed under the GPL. And then _their_ property > >> >> rights chip in, and they are perfectly allowed to give you license > >> > > >> > Except that the GPL blatantly misstates the scope of property rights > >> > under copyright. It pretends that both 17 USC 109 and 117 are simply > >> > nonexistent (true in the GNU Republic). Then comes the issue of price > >> > fixing at predatory ("no charge") level of pooled IP in derivative > >> > and collective works. > >> > >> You are babbling. This sort of babbling constitutes so little in way > >> of a coherent argument that it has already been thrown out of court > >> (remember Wallace?) in spite of your gleeful appreciation of it. > > > > I'm in good company. http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise2.html > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/a3f76440df6b36c1 > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.int-property/msg/4d2438aa5d80f803 > > > > And as for Wallace (his other case is under appeal now), to quote > > Hollaar: > > > > (http://groups.google.com/group/misc.int-property/msg/4d2438aa5d80f803) > > > > ------ > > There has been some mention in this newsgroup in the past about the > > antitrust suit in Indiana regarding the GPL (Daniel Wallace v. Free > > Software Foundation, Inc.). > > [...] > > Get your attributions right. The above message by Hollaar contains > nothing from what you pretend to quote.
I meant http://groups.google.com/group/misc.int-property/msg/53225114939815b8 I've referred to http://groups.google.com/group/misc.int-property/msg/4d2438aa5d80f803 twice. This one shows Moglens ignorance. And Stallmans obsession with redefinition of things. ------ The convenient redefinition of things in the GPL reminds me of a quote from Abraham Lincoln: How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg. ------ regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss