Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > Qua, 2006-07-05 Ã s 11:16 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > > > > > Ter, 2006-07-04 Ã s 19:17 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > > > > Q: Bzzzzt, but according to RMS, "intellectual property... is a mirage, > > > > which appears to have a coherent existence only because the term > > > > suggests it does." So bzzzzt, what the fuck ... !? > > > > > > > > A: Well, well, well. But according to one FTC commissioner (and an > > > > antitrust attorney), > > > > > > Alex, please let me understand your reasoning: > > > > > > Because a text is published by some law authority like FTC "is", or > > > Attoneries are, or even Judges... does that have to be taken as Official > > > in the Point of View of Law? > > > > Consider: > > (...) > > Will you please answer my question, instead? > It's a simple 'yes' or 'no'...
42. Next question, please. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
