Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > John Hasler wrote: >> >> Tim Smith wrote: >> > The copies were pretty clearly made lawfully under GPL. I am clearly the >> > owner of the copies. So, why can't I take advantage of first sale and >> > sell them, without the need of copyright permission? >> >> Because you agreed not to sell them without source when you accepted the >> GPL which you did when you made the copies. > > Ahhh. But don't you know that the GPL is not a contract (agreement) in > the GNU Republic, uncle Hasler? :-)
You can claim either agreement or non-agreement with the conditions. Your choice. In the latter case, you had no permission to copy in the first place. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
