Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/13/2010 1:25 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
I'm just curious, what "automatically terminate" does
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf
then talking about, in your view, oh paragon of GNUtardiness dak?
What it says:
<http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>
Thus, once each Defendant made a distribution that did not comply
with the License, that Defendant lost any and all right to copy,
modify, or distribute BusyBox. Any copying, modification, or
distribution of BusyBox after that time by each Defendant was and is
without Plaintiffs' permission.
Since you and DAK are incapable of understanding the meaning and
operation of a "condition precedent" as used in copyright contracts,
you will forever remain confused concerning licensing fundamentals.
Sincerely,
RJack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
