Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/13/2010 3:52 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
17 U.S.C. ยง 109(a)
The copies made and distributed by the defendants in this case are
not first-sale copies, and therefore the first-sale doctrine does not
give them permission to do so in violation of the GPL.
Since you and Hyman are incapable of understanding the meaning and
operation of a "condition precedent" as used in copyright contracts,
you will forever remain confused concerning licensing fundamentals.
Sincerely,
RJack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
