Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> >> On 4/13/2010 2:22 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: >> > Copies lawfully made fall under 17 USC 109 >> >> Certainly. > > Right, to wit: > > http://www.terekhov.de/Samsung-Answer.pdf > > "As a separate and distinct Twelfth Affirmative Defense and each > claim for relief alleged therein, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ > claim for copyright infringement is barred under at least the > provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as Defendant was licensed and any > copies alleged to be infringing were, therefore, lawfully made. "
You really have to stop confusing the arguments of either party as being legally relevant before the court says so. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
