On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 14:07, Derek Atkins wrote: > Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > For example, I want a query to be: > > > > > > a && (b || (c && d)) > > > > To ensure grouping in a complicated expression, it's > > best to combine two simpler queries together with > > xaccQueryMerge. So you might create the query for > > c && d, and a query for 'b', and combine them, and > > then combine the resulting query with one for 'a'. > > Ok, if I'm going to create the query for, e.g. c AND d, > what's the right way of doing that? In particular, I > only want one logic operator, but I have to supply one > with each term. Do I need to create both the 'c' and > 'd' terms with AND, or do I put 'OR c' and 'AND d', or > is there something else what I'm missing?
The operator for the very first term in a query is ignored. So you choose QUERY_AND when you add the second one and you should get what you want. dave
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
