[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
> I would strongly encourage adding a name-mapping between the
> c-object name and the sql-table name. I'm not sure how general your
> mechanism is, but if you have any hope of getting more general than what
> gnucash needs, having this kind of mapping would be a must-have feature.
As I've been implementing the XML bindings, I realized that yes, you
could make the SQL bindings take a table-name. So, yes, this would
work. In fact, I wound up doing something like this for the XML
extensions, to define the XML tag for each object.
The way I've architected the backend-extensions, each backend defines
it's own extension structure. Therefore, each backend can require
whatever data and methods is needs. This also means that I didn't
have to make any assumption about a generic backend extension.
> --linas
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
