It would be really nice to do some concrete tests to get some real numbers on this. It would definitely be something to put up on the website.
Later, GJC -- Gregory Casamento ----- Original Message ---- From: Helge Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Developer GNUstep <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 2:24:39 PM Subject: Re: GNUstep Makes Fast Scientific Code, Faster Than Cocoa. On Oct 3, 2006, at 18:17, Daniel J Farrell wrote: > Now, not a true test by any means just a tentative suggestion from > a large command line app. The app is basically a scientific number > cruncher. I have run the same code, on the same computer, one > compiled in xcode linking to Cocoa Foundation and the other > compiled using gcc make, make install, openapp etc. linked to > GNUstep Base. The GNUstep version is 50% faster (47.8% increase to > be more precise). Does GNUstep-base work with the Apple runtime or do you use the GNU Objective-C runtime? If you want to further optimize the issue you should have a look in Shark. By comparing the output of the Cocoa with GNUstep binary you should also be able to tell why GNUstep performs better in your specific case. Thanks, Helge -- Helge Hess http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/ _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
