Greetings, On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 08:22 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Many thanks to Michael Eisen for citing the source for his prior posting about a question of interpretation in the new Nature Licensing Agreement. The question is about one ambiguous sentence -- not in the Nature License itself, or the official Nature FAQ about it, but in a promotional Nature news-item that was written about it. I am rather confident -- though I am fully prepared to admit it publicly if I prove to be wrong -- that my (charitable) interpretation of this sentence is the correct one.
Just wondering Stevan if you ever got a response from Nature to your open letter. I don't want to open the whole thing up for debate again, but I am curious if this was ever clarified by Nature to your satisfaction. Cheers, Mark Mark Doyle Manager, Product Development The American Physical Society do...@aps.org
