Fifteen months ago 35-year old French scientist Michaël Bon launched a new
open-access publishing service called the Self-Journal of Science (SJS). 

 

SJS describes itself as a “non-commercial, multidisciplinary repository that
provides journal-like services to entrust the evaluation, classification and
communication of research to the unrestricted collective intelligence of the
scientific community itself.”

 

What is noteworthy about SJS is that it is not another open access journal,
but a new-style publishing platform, and one that could be viewed as a
direct challenge to the top-down power structure of academia, and to the
oligarchic editorial boards of legacy journals.

 

It is also worth noting that Bon was not aware of the open access movement
when he conceived SJS. His aim was to fix what he sees as serious problems
in the current scholarly communication system – problems of quality, of
transparency, and of effectiveness. 

 

When he did find out about the open access movement Bon concluded that OA
advocates have been trying to do things back to front, and as a result have
played into the hands of publishers.

 

That is, in seeking to fix the access issue prior to fixing the structural
flaws in the current publishing system the open access movement is
overseeing the relocation of a broken model into a new environment. 

 

By contrast, says Bon, SJS is focused on exploiting the new environment to
reinvent scholarly communication. In the process, he says, the access issue
is solved collaterally – since openness is a given in SJS’ modus operandi.

 

If you want to find out more about how SJS works, about Bon’s philosophy and
objectives, and where he thinks the OA movement has gone wrong, you can read
a Q&A with him here: 

 

http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/the-oa-interviews-michael-bon-founder.
html

 

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to