This is the latest one in Gomatak Times, 98122009, pg 3 that reveals GBA's free 
size knickers. "They recently called on , Chief Town Planner Morad Ahmed on 
Friday last to discuss the entire gamut of issues pertaining to RP 2021. 
"We were emphatic on the point of a speedy finalisation of RP 2021, the absence 
of which has sparked off, some problems," GBA activist Sabina Martins told GT." 
GBA was emphatic about speedy finalisation of RP 2021 is to be noted. Who has a 
problem with the absence of RP 2021? Catch word is 'some problem', what about 
the rest of the problems which will not be addressed by RP 2021? 
So my long pending question since 2007 remains unanswered by GBA. What is the 
model of Regional Plan that GBA has in mind in light of the 73rd and 74th 
Constitution Amendment? Is it in agreement with the present process of RP 2021 
that is spelt out in Chapter III of the TCP Act? 
The constitution of India ensures freedom of expression and the right to know. 
But to question GBA's policy publicly amounts to be treason. So the 
unprincipled Soter D'Souza of GBA  from Socorro village of Bardez in Goa now 
awaits the execution of the threat by one of GBA's member as part of the Way 
Forward to weed out the lice. 

-Soter D'Souza



Reply via email to