Dear Samir, You said: "It doesnt suit you only talking negative."
I state that if you considered your exposure of corruption in infotech and attack on DG as negative, then my exposure of GBA's fraud could also be considered negative. If not, I am equally positive like you about exposing double standards with conspirators against the interests of the Goan people.
You said: "If GBA is screwed up, what happened to GPA ? What prevented you from leading a better GPA to solve the problems that GBA couldnt? Instead, you are forever wasting your time in attacking GBA."
I state that GPA was not a people's movement. It was an acronym for 'Goa People's Assembly'. I hope you a learned person can see the difference between GBA and GPA and not get mislead by fools. If you consider exposing corruption in Infotech and Narvekar was a waste of time then probably my exposure of GBA is also so. What prevented you from setting up an Infotech Company and showing a model of development of IT in Goa? Do we need to publicly declare what initiatives we are involved with so that communal socialist elements who rape Goa can be in the know?
You say: "What I did for Infotech corporation is known to all. Thanks to my initiative which was later taken up by others, the corrupt. Infotech park was stopped." I say that though you may have exposed the land scam and corruption in the Infotech park, you are indirectly admitting to being part of the over all concept in setting up such projects in Goa's forest areas and in water catchment areas of Socorro. Isn't it?
You say: "In fact, I am still paying the price for it as Narvekar has come after me using the Assembly Breach of privilege." I say that I have been tortured since 1988 because I have opposed his projects and designs. That is the price one has to pay to speak the truth though even I sympathise with you.
regards, Soter
