Whatever the argument is or was, I am simply not part of it. I was  
motivated by a simple desire to convey accurate historical information. That's  
hardly a waste of energy, not as far as I am concerned. And as far as Ikeda is  
concerned, I do believe that the quote that I provided shows this 
particularly  lamentable action was perpetrated at Toda's instigation, not 
Ikeda's. 
 
Anyway, I am glad that you have admitted to finding this all so amusing and 
 have taken to mocking individuals who are merely trying to set the record  
straight. This, along with your admitted penchant towards resorting to 
violence  tells me all I need to know. Thanks so much.
 
Ernesto
 
 
In a message dated 6/19/2010 12:38:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  de
sertmonk2...@yahoo.com writes:



hahhaah..lol.Your so honest ernesto...lol..so wh at is  the purpose for all 
this? I mean I thought that Ikeda was stilling  dragging old men to the 
cementary..I mean why are we even wasting energy  on Ikeda?lol

--- On Sat, 6/19/10, Nancy Rogow  <illarr...@yahoo.com> wrote:


From:  Nancy Rogow <illarr...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re:  [GohonzonForum] Toda, the YMD and Ogasawara
To:  GohonzonForum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 19, 2010, 11:03  AM


 
 
Dear  Ernesto:

I'm glad you did.

Mark



 
____________________________________
 From: "kokoroinla@  aol.com" <kokoroi...@aol. com>
To: GohonzonForum@ yahoogroups.  com
Sent: Sat, June  19, 2010 9:57:51 AM
Subject: Re: [GohonzonForum]  Toda, the YMD and Ogasawara


 
Hi Miguel,
 
Yes, they did admit their conduct, but honestly, how can one  rightly feel 
justified for mobbing, roughing up, punching the lights  out of, and 
dragging an 80 something year old man to a cemetery in the  middle of the night 
simply because he had a doctrinal position that  was different from their's?
 
As far as to what this has to do with SGI today, well, I have no  idea. I 
came into this conversation rather late, so I really don't  know what it was 
all about or how it got started. However, since  I saw this event being 
spoken of, and since I had accurate  information on it, I thought that I should 
post it. That's  it.
 
Ernesto
 
 
In a message dated 6/19/2010 12:28:12 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
desertmonk2002@ _yahoo.com_ (http://yahoo.com/)  writes:



Ok..Thank you Ernesto..so they admitted there conduct and  felt justify....
 
Now what does that event have to do with SGI Today? Like  I 
said..everything that happened by then was in the context of  a historic Event 
ww2..II..

--- On Sat, 6/19/10,  kokoroi...@aol. com <kokoroi...@aol. com>  wrote:



From:  kokoroi...@aol. com <kokoroi...@aol. com>
Subject:  [GohonzonForum] Toda, the YMD and Ogasawara
To:  GohonzonForum@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Saturday, June 19,  2010, 12:08 AM


 
 
Miguel,
 
Here is the quote in full:
 
    "Toda felt particularly bitter  toward one Taiseki-ji priest, Jimon 
Ogasawara, who had  favored the merger of Nichiren Shoshu with Nichiren Shu at  
Minobu to conform with the government policy of unifying all  Nichiren 
sects. Ogasawara also advocated the eclectic  Shinto-Buddhist theology, 
according to which Buddhist  deities were merely manifestations of the true  
deities--those of Shinto. Such had been the atmosphere at  Taiseki-ji when 
Makiguchi was called to the temple and  directed to moderate his outspokenness 
in 
the interest of  good relations between the temple and the authorities. Toda  
felt that the priests, and Ogasawara in particular, were  thereby largely 
responsible for the government suppression  of Soka Kyoiku Gakkai and for 
Makiguchi's death in  jail.
    "Toda never forgot this, nor  did he forgive Ogasawara. On the eve of 
April 28, 1952, when  Taiseki-ji held a major service to commemorate the 
founding  of the Nichiren Sect in 1253, Toda visited the temple with  four 
thousand members of his Youth Division and assaulted  Ogasawara. Toda felt 
justified in doing so to avenge his  late teacher and demanded an apology from 
the 
octogenarian  priest. When Ogasawara refused, the young men, who included  
Ikeda, later president of Soka Gakkai, mobbed him and  carried him on their 
shoulders, tagging him with a placard  inscribed 'Tanuki Bozu' (Racoon 
Monk). Ogasawara was taken  to Makigushi's grave, where he was forced to sign a 
 
statement of apology.
    "Recalling this incident in an  interview with the author in July 1956, 
Toda admited hitting  the priest 'twice' and said that this was the cause 
of the  extremely unfavorable press his organization then  received--which 
labeled Soka Gakkai as a 'violent  religion.'
    "Ogasawara filed a complaint  with the authorities against Soka Gakkai 
for assault and  battery. In November 1958, Nissho, the high priest of  
Taiseki-ji, reprimanded Toda for the April 27 incident, and  Toda responded 
with 
an apology printed in Seikyo Shimbun,  Soka Gakkai's organ. He promised 
that Soka Gakkai would  follow 'the iron rule of absolute obedience to the 
policy of  the [Taiseki-ji] administration' and would continue to serve  its 
interests. 'In response to the high priest's  admonition,' he said, 'we shall 
forget completely what  happened in the past. . . .But if Mr. Ogasawara 
should take  steps like those he took during the war . . . we will  resolutely 
carry out a firm struggle to safeguard our  cannon. For the sin of having 
troubled the high priest, I am  resolved to atone and apologize with the 
conversion of the  entire nation. It goes without saying that members of the  
Youth 
Division follow me in this regard.'
    "In a pamphlet issued in May  1955, Ogasawara similarly 'repented' his 
'indiscretion in  having had the unfortunate conflict with Soka Gakkai.'  
Ikeda, who led the four thousand young men to mob Ogasawara,  says now that 
the incident was an act of kindness because  the old priest, made to realize 
his apostasy, was grateful  to Toda and Soka Gakkai and died a happy man."
 
This excerpt was taken from pages 95 to 97 of the book,  Japan's New 
Buddhism: An Objective Account of Soka Gakkai,  by Kiyoaki Murata, published by 
Walker/Weatherhill in 1969.  LCC Card No. 74-83640.
 
In the book's Foreword, on pages ix and x, Daisaku  Ikeda writes the 
following about this book:
 
    "As for the facts given in this  book concerning the Soka Gakkai, I can 
say with assurance  that the book is more accurate than any other on the  
subject. Some of the bits of information the author has dug  out in the 
course of his research are printed for the first  time."
    "I hope that this work by Mr.  Kiyoaki Murata will play a role in 
bringing correct  understanding of the Sokagakkai to many people..."
 
To which I say, "Indeed!"
 
Ernesto
 
 
In a message dated 6/18/2010 07:21:08 A.M. Pacific  Daylight Time, 
desertmonk2002@ yahoo.com writes:



Ernesto I am very interested in the  quote...As you know..".from the mouth 
of two or  three witnesses".. ...

--- On Thu,  6/17/10, kokoroi...@aol. com <kokoroi...@aol.  com> wrote:


From:  kokoroi...@aol. com <kokoroi...@aol.  com>
Subject: Re: [GohonzonForum] Re: [The  Bible of Shakubuku] supervised by 
Taisaku Ikeda,  SGI
To: GohonzonForum@ yahoogroups.  com
Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 3:28  PM


 


Him and some  of his mates in the SGI battered a Priest who  was in his 60s 
because he disagreed with their  views. This happened way back in the days, 
40s  or 50s. If you search the net you will find the  correct information 
as I did.  

This event is discussed in the  now long out of print book, Japan's New 
Buddhism.  The priest is described there as being an  "octogenarian, " meaning 
he was in his eighties,  not sixties. The YMD went to the old priest's home  
and dragged (literally and eventually carried) him  to a cemetery in the 
middle of the night. He was  roughed up and forced to apologize to  the tomb 
of Makiguchi in his underwear. If I  recall correctly, the old priest's 
"crime" was in  writing a doctrinal paper stating that the time  for Shakabuku 
was over (but I might be wrong about  this). Ikeda, himself, wrote the preface 
to this  book, highly praising it. It was either the first,  or one of the 
first, scholarly works to be done  about the Gakkai by an independent 
source. If  anyone is interested, I can post a quote directly  from the book, 
as 
well as publishing  information.


Ernesto

































Reply via email to